NSE: SIDDHIKA
BSE:
/100
Quality Score
Not Eligible20.17/100
Valuation Score
Expensive Valuation52.87/100
Technical Score
Technically NeutralPeer Comparison
All values except ratios in INR(Crores)
Quarterly Results
All values except ratios in INR(Crores)
Annual Results
All values except ratios in INR(Crores)
Financial Ratios
All values except ratios in INR(Crores)
Balance Sheet
All values except ratios in INR(Crores)
Cash Flow
All values except ratios in INR(Crores)
Peer Comparison
Volume Analysis
SMA/EMA (Moving Average) Analysis
Price Change Analysis
Pivot Level
Active Candlesticks
Bullish Candlestick Patterns
Bearish Candlestick Patterns
What is QVT?
Quality
The Quality Score is based on company's financial and management quality and long term performance. Quality scores above 55 are considered good (G) and below 35 are considered bad (B). Whereas, scores between 35-55 are considered neutral/Medium/Middle (M).
- 10055Good (G) Q
- 35Neutral, Medium, Middle (M) Q
- 0Bad (B) Q
Value
The Valuation Score tracks how expensive the stock is versus its peers. Valuation scores above 50 are considered good (G) and below 30 are considered bad (B). Scores between 30-50 are considered neutral/Medium/Middle (M).
- 10050Good (G) Q
- 30Neutral, Medium, Middle (M) Q
- 0Bad (B) Q
Technical
The Technical Score tracks the bullishness or bearishness of a particular stock relative to the entire stock universe. A Technical Score above 59 is considered good (G) and below 30 is considered bad (B). Scores between 30-59 are considered neutral/Medium/Middle (M).
- 10059Good (G) Q
- 30Neutral, Medium, Middle (M) Q
- 0Bad (B) Q
S
Strengths 8
- Strong Annual EPS Growth
- Effectively using its capital to generate profit - RoCE improving in last 2 years
- Effectively using Shareholders fund - Return on equity (ROE) improving since last 2 year
- Efficient in managing Assets to generate Profits - ROA improving since last 2 year
- Company with No Debt
- Strong cash generating ability from core business - Improving Cash Flow from operation for last 2 years
- Annual Net Profits improving for last 2 years
- Company with Zero Promoter Pledge
W
Weaknesses 2
- Negative Breakdown Third Support (LTP < S3)
- Declining Net Cash Flow : Companies not able to generate net cash
O
Opportunities 0
T
Threats 0
