NSE: AAVAS
BSE:
35.67/100
Quality Score
Medium Financial Strength24.00/100
Valuation Score
Expensive Valuation46.87/100
Technical Score
Technically NeutralPeer Comparison
All values except ratios in INR(Crores)
Quarterly Results
All values except ratios in INR(Crores)
Annual Results
All values except ratios in INR(Crores)
Financial Ratios
All values except ratios in INR(Crores)
Balance Sheet
All values except ratios in INR(Crores)
Cash Flow
All values except ratios in INR(Crores)
Peer Comparison
Volume Analysis
SMA/EMA (Moving Average) Analysis
Price Change Analysis
Pivot Level
Active Candlesticks
Bullish Candlestick Patterns
Bearish Candlestick Patterns
What is QVT?
Quality
The Quality Score is based on company's financial and management quality and long term performance. Quality scores above 55 are considered good (G) and below 35 are considered bad (B). Whereas, scores between 35-55 are considered neutral/Medium/Middle (M).
- 10055Good (G) Q
- 35Neutral, Medium, Middle (M) Q
- 0Bad (B) Q
Value
The Valuation Score tracks how expensive the stock is versus its peers. Valuation scores above 50 are considered good (G) and below 30 are considered bad (B). Scores between 30-50 are considered neutral/Medium/Middle (M).
- 10050Good (G) Q
- 30Neutral, Medium, Middle (M) Q
- 0Bad (B) Q
Technical
The Technical Score tracks the bullishness or bearishness of a particular stock relative to the entire stock universe. A Technical Score above 59 is considered good (G) and below 30 is considered bad (B). Scores between 30-59 are considered neutral/Medium/Middle (M).
- 10059Good (G) Q
- 30Neutral, Medium, Middle (M) Q
- 0Bad (B) Q
S
Strengths 9
- Company with high TTM EPS Growth
- Good quarterly growth in the recent results
- Effectively using Shareholders fund - Return on equity (ROE) improving since last 2 year
- Company reducing Debt
- Increasing Revenue every Quarter for the past 4 Quarters
- Company able to generate Net Cash - Improving Net Cash Flow for last 2 years
- Annual Net Profits improving for last 2 years
- Book Value per share Improving for last 2 years
- Company with Zero Promoter Pledge
W
Weaknesses 3
- Poor cash generated from core business - Declining Cash Flow from Operations for last 2 years
- Decline in Net Profit with falling Profit Margin (QoQ)
- Low Piotroski Score : Companies with weak financials
O
Opportunities 1
- Decrease in Provision in recent results
T
Threats 0
